Smart working. The impact of work organisation and job design Essay

Smart working. The impact of work organisation and job design - Essay Example It is claimed that the most significant resource of any business is the people it employs, its manpower or workforce. As the world adopts technology at a faster rate with more sophisticated applications and as products tend towards greater similarity there is a growing awareness that a business may differentiate itself by creating a quality, focused and well-motivated workforce. In addition, the world labor market is become more flexible with greater mobility for well-qualified staff to move between major business centers. It is therefore of greater significance than ever before to keep good staff and to continue to attract the best recruits possible. Due to the importance of the people of the company it is equally important and difficult for the managers to manage these people. With the passage of time, the world of work and the workers in it are becoming more and more competitive and aggressive about their success at work. The advent of globalization has demolished the economic barriers that once existed and has opened doors to markets that were once thought to be too out of reach to cater. The change in the attitude towards workforce management has been great and fundamental since the early years of the twentieth century and the introduction of mass production. There are still firms and factories that 'hire and fire' workers on an almost daily basis and offer no training and staff development at all. However, these are now the exception rather than the rule. Modern Human Resource Management has been developed not just in response to the legal constraints on how workers are treated but also as a recognition that a truly successful and competitive business depends on the support and co-ordination of a well trained and suitably motivated team of staff.

Wong Sun v. United States & Nardone v. United States Case Study

Wong Sun v. United States & Nardone v. United States - Case Study Example The fifth amendment for example under the grand jury clause requires the states to try felonies only after indictment by grand juries. As such, the process requires effective collection of evidence and witness accounts (Friedman, 1993). In the case, the prosecutor use evidence and witness statements he collected illegally by forcing the second petitioner to make the statements in his bedroom. Additionally, the sixth amendment of the American constitution incorporated the value of human rights in judicial processes by explaining that under notice of accusation, an indictment must claim all the features of the crime. The significance of the case was that it set precedence by refusing the use of illegally acquired evidence. The use of fruits of the poisonous tree, which refers to illegally acquired evidence as was in the case above, contributes to breaches on the rights of the people (Helmholz, 1997). Holding: The court ruled that the evidence were in deed inadmissible owing to the clandestine nature of their collection. The plaintiff proved that the wiretapping was both unlawful and breached on his basic human rights. Reasoning: Privacy is a fundamental feature of personal freedom. The American bill of rights safeguards the basic rights and freedoms of the citizenry. The Fifth Amendment for example provides effective ways that ensure that people do not incriminate themselves. Such rights as the Miranda rights are vital in making sure that a suspect considers his words with the view to protecting himself (American Bar Association, 2001). The provision of the Fifth Amendment thus makes the wiretapping on the plaintiff’s phone unlawful. The process did not only breach the plaintiff’s privacy but also made hi incriminate himself. According to the Fifth Amendment, incriminating of oneself refers to any process that makes one expose himself or herself to a charge. Just as was the case in Wong Sun v. United States, this case presented a similar opportunity in